"Given Governor Huntsman is that the intervention in Libya is at the heart of our national security interest," said Huntsman's press secretary, Tim Miller.
Huntsman's position made him the first candidate to outline a clear 2012 - for the mission to Libya in the light of an imminent collapse regime of Muammar Gaddafi - and unchanged. Terry Bran City: Jon Huntsman, a star approaching
Governor Branstad said former Utah Governor Jon Huntsman, chairman of the GOP candidate is a "tragic mistake" using the "skip Iowa" strategy.
In a television appearance ABC "This Week" program Sunday, Huntsman took shots in the Caucasus, Iowa.
"You know, in New Hampshire elected presidents," Huntsman said on ABC. The most recent Republican president, George W. Bush won the Iowa caucuses, and Iowa Governor Huntsman bristles comment.
Why the press Loves Jon Huntsman, but ignores Ron Paul
The media are fascinated by the candidates in protest, as a criticism of their own parties, but it marginalizes those who attack the establishment
Complete with fam.jpg Hunter
Jon Huntsman, will not win the nomination of the GOP, or if the experts assure us. "Huntsman has a prophetic role in this campaign, if he chooses to adopt it: who is telling the truth," he writes. As much as I agree with Sullivan, fallow, Weisberg, and all other journalists praise Huntsman to challenge orthodox thinking in the GOP, and yet I am struck by the very different standards that govern the coverage of two other candidates, Ron Paul and Gary Johnson.
None of Huntsman and Paul Johnson, and probably win. All three are challenging orthodoxies of thought of the party. Huntsman is a challenge orthodoxies of thought that affect only the GOP, and take a position, reflecting the conventional wisdom in the media: evolution is a fact, so is climate change, and the debt ceiling had to be. Instead, Johnson and Paul are challenging orthodoxies of thought, which is a bi-partisan in nature, and be involved a lot of media and political establishment.
The debt ceiling was already on top. Huntsman, however, pointed out by such statements. Questioning the American aggressive, interventionist foreign policy and not the drug war, politics, which is extremely expensive, indirect, and implemented in ways that are immoral and demonstrable damage to our civil liberties, and Paul Johnson does not points to speak uncomfortable truths, shining a light on the apology, or influence the political conversation for the better.
Some "protest candidates" are lauded as telling the truth with justice to speak out against their political interests, as they are crucial to strengthen and not weaken the position of center on consensus.
Rightly, in the case of Huntsman.
But a candidate of protest that challenge the understanding of foreign policy, drug war, or civil liberties are not taken into account, regardless of the quality of the substantive arguments on these issues. Beneficial effect that the protest may be candidates for political discourse, even if you do not win is completely forgotten. Critique the foreign policy of Paul is a serious, consistent, and above all without response.)
Four years later, when Libertarian candidates do some of the criticisms themselves, they are ignored because many items previously described as radical by the general public is now adopted by the Democratic standard-bearer of their party, and Republicans are very traditional with it.
I am always in praise of play to tell the truth, so congratulations to Huntsman. Evolution exists. Climate change is real. If the press really trying to protest against the candidates of the air arguments to shed light on dodges and improve the political conversation, as Weisberg suggests, we must look serious criticism that business, because neither political party wants recognize.
No comments:
Post a Comment